|
Authority |
One liner |
|
2025(06)LCX0425
Delhi High Court
Sudhir Gulati |
Bail once granted cannot be cancelled
without cogent and overwhelming reasons. |
|
2025(06)LCX0424
Delhi High Court
Rakesh Kumar Goyal |
Bail rightly granted
post-charge sheet; no ground for recall under Section 482 CrPC. |
|
2025(05)LCX0539
Allahabad High Court
Dushyant Chaudhary |
Bail granted due to prolonged pre-trial custody and weak prima facie
evidence. |
|
2025(04)LCX0425
Allahabad High Court
Praveen Kumar |
Bail granted due to prolonged pre-trial custody and weak prima facie
evidence. |
|
2025(04)LCX0290
Supreme court of India
Vineet Jain |
Bail should not be denied in GST-related
documentary offences absent extraordinary circumstances. |
|
2024(10)LCX0368
Orissa High Court
Ganni Ajay Dora |
Order alleging liability of unpaid tax and consequent penalty is set
aside for fresh consideration on the ground that assessee being unwell
was prevented from prosecuting his appeal. |
|
2024(03)LCX0274
Rajasthan High Court
Ashutosh Garg |
Bail for offence u/s 132(1) (b) (c) (f) (j)
(l) of the CGST Act, 2017 is not granted. |
|
2019(02)LCX0002
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Jagdish Kanani |
Bail application dismissed of accused
involved in supply goods and services without invoice and vice versa
involving tax evasion of more than 500 lakhs |
|
2019(03)LCX0038
Allahabad High Court
Vikalp Jain |
High Court upheld the bail condition of Rs.1
crore GST deposit, citing serious tax evasion allegations.
|
|
2018(09)LCX0016
Punjab & Haryana High Court
Harmeet Singh |
Anticipatory bail confirmed as custodial
interrogation was deemed unnecessary and petitioner had cooperated
|
|
2019(03)LCX0003
Punjab & Haryana High Court
Shree Enterprises &M/s Vicky Road Carrier |
Goods along with vehicle detain on the
unilateral presumption that the consignor is indulging in issuing tax
invoices fraudulently without causing any movement of goods in violation
of Section 122(1) of KGST Act |
|
2018(12)LCX0026
Gujarat High Court
Amitkumar Hasmukhlal Takkar |
Bail granted for offence punishable
u/s132(1)(i) to accused running brokerage agency involved in fake
invoicing |
|
2018(12)LCX0027
Gujarat High Court
Anilbhai Jayantibhai Bhut |
Bail granted as entire offence is based on
presumptions and surmises |
|
2018(10)LCX0014
Punjab Haryana High Court
Pawan Kumar |
Bail granted as petitioner was in custody,
trial delayed, and no further interrogation needed.
|
|
2019(02)LCX0020
Jharkhand High Court
Pramod Agarwal Pradeep
Agarwal, Suman Agarwal, Ravi Agarwal |
Central Intelligence Officer has no
jurisdiction to arrest the petitioners when they appear before the
Senior Intelligence Officer, on the first date itself pursuant to
summons |
|
2019(03)LCX0033
Rajasthan High Court
Leel Electricals Limited
Versus |
Court is not convinced by arguments advanced
by petitioner, therfore notice of summon is not quashed |
|
2019(04)LCX0007
Telangana High Court
P.V. Ramana Reddy |
Bail denied; revenue interest and flight
risk outweigh COVID concerns in GST evasion by foreigners.
|
|
2018(12)LCX0018
Jharkhand High Court
Satya Prakash Singh |
Bail granted to accused for offence
punishable u/s 132(1)(c) alleged to have taken benefit of Rs 30 cr |
|
2020(06)LCX0073
Chennai High Court
A.Mohideen |
Bail granted for offence u/s 132(1)(b),(c)
in view of Covid-19. |
|
2020(07)LCX0079
Rajasthan High Court
Anup Ashopa |
Bail granted to CA for offence of input tax
evasion on furnishing personal bond with 2 sureties. |
|
2020(04)LCX0036
Chennai High Court
Choe Jae Won, Choi Yong Suk |
Detention in Special Camp upheld as COVID-19
concerns and flight risk outweighed personal liberty.
|
|
2021(02)LCX0036
Gujarat High Court
Basanat Pherumal Makhija |
Bail granted to person alleged in GST
evasion of 9cr due to clandestine purchase of goods and disposing of
manufactured goods without showing any record |
|
2022(09)LCX0016
Allahabad High Court
Peeyush Kumar Jain |
Bail granted for offence u/s 132(1)(a),(i)
after furnishing a personal bond and two sureties. |
