NOTIFICATIONS

Notification No. Subject

Notification No.23/2022-Central Tax, dt. 23.11.2022

Seeks to empower the Competition Commission of India to handle anti-profiteering cases under CGST Act, 2017 with effect from 01.12.2022

Notification No.65/2020-Central Tax, dt. 01.09.2020

Seeks to amend notification no. 35/2020-Central Tax dt. 03.04.2020 to extend due date of compliance under Section 171 which falls during the period from "20.03.2020 to 29.11.2020" till 30.11.2020

PRESS RELEASE

Date

Subject

21.06.2019 FM chairs 35th GST Council meeting in Delhi; decisions regarding setting up of GSTAT, extension of tenure of National Anti-Profiteering Authority and introduction of e-invoicing taken
25.07.2017 On National Anti-profiteering Authority under GST

COMMUNITY INSIGHTS

Topic

Publish Date

"You Can't Pass Off Tax Relief as Extra Grams": Delhi HC in Sharma Trading Company v. Union of India Reinforces the No-Profiteering Rule

The Delhi High Court has once again underlined a simple, consumer-centric principle at the heart of India's anti-profiteering law: when GST is cut or input tax credit (ITC) gains arise, prices must go down commensurately. You cannot keep the same MRP, bump up the base price, or "compensate" with more product quantity (extra grammage) or freebies. In Sharma Trading Company, a distributor of HUL products, the Court upheld a National Anti-Profiteering Authority...... Read More

08.11.2025

Sunsetting Anti-Profiteering: A Shift from Transition to Stability under GST

When GST was introduced in 2017, Section 171 of the CGST Act brought in anti-profiteering provisions as a temporary safeguard to protect consumers during the transition to this new tax regime. The aim was to ensure that any reduction in GST rates or benefit of input tax credit was passed on to the ultimate consumer by way of a commensurate reduction in prices....................... Read More

22.05.2025

CASE LAW

Authority

One liner

2020(07)LCX0059

Delhi High Court

Samsonite South Asia Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi HC permitted Samsonite to pay profiteering amount in instalments, staying interest and penalty.

 

2021(01)LCX0109

Delhi High Court

BPTP LTD.

Court stayed anti-profiteering probe on 14 projects; permitted limited investigation on Discovery Project to continue.
 

2021(02)LCX0054

Delhi High Court

Infiniti Retail Ltd.

Challenge to anti-profiteering provisions admitted; stay granted subject to deposit of principal profiteered amount.
 

2021(02)LCX0175

Delhi High Court

Bonne Sante

Section 171 CGST Act anti-profiteering challenge admitted; recovery stayed upon partial payment in instalments.

2024(01)LCX0467

Delhi High Court

Reckitt Benckiser India Private Limited

Constitutional validity of Section 171 of CGST Act as well as Rules 122, 124, 126, 127, 129, 133 and 134 of the CGST Rules, 2017 is upheld