NOTIFICATION
|
Notification No. |
Subject |
| Notification No. 56/2023-Central Tax dt. 28.12.2023 | Seeks to extend dates of specified compliances in exercise of powers under section 168A of CGST Act |
| Extension of limitation under Section 168A of CGST Act | |
| Seeks to extend dates of specified compliances in exercise of powers under section 168A of CGST Act |
COMMUNITY INSIGHTS
|
Topic |
Publish Date |
|
|
|
Limitation is the Law: Telangana High Court Quashes GST Order Passed One Day Late In tax adjudication, timelines are not mere guidelines but mandatory legal safeguards. The Telangana High Court’s decision in M/s Lakshmi Bhanu Steel Traders v. Assistant Commissioner (ST), Madhapur-2 Circle & Ors. [WP No. 16297 of 2025, decided on 25.06.2025] reaffirms that an order passed even a single day beyond the prescribed limitation period under Section 73 of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017 is without jurisdiction and liable to be quashed....... Read More |
10.09.2025 |
|
|
GST Notification Struck Down: High Court Upholds Taxpayers Rights in Landmark Ruling In a landmark judgment, the Gauhati High Court has delivered a significant ruling that strengthens taxpayers’ rights by striking down Notification No. 56/2023-Central Tax, dated December 28, 2023, as ultra vires the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017. The decision in Mahabir Tiwari v. The Union of India (WP(C)/567/2024) [2025(06)LCX0400] reaffirms the sanctity of statutory limitations and the constitutional.......... Read More |
14.07.2025 |
CASE LAW
|
Authority |
One liner |
|
2025(07)LCX0139 Calcutta High Court Somenath Ghosh |
Statutory time limits for GST proceedings stand extended if annual return deadlines are officially deferred. |
|
2025(03)LCX0152 Allahabad High Court Parkash Machinery Stores |
GST orders for the FY 2017-18 are quashed as they were passed beyond the time limit as per Section 73(10) of the U.P. GST Act |
|
2024(05)LCX0330 Allahabad High Court Graziano Trasmissioni |
Extension N/No. 09/2023 u/s 168A for adjudicating proceedings for the FY 2017-18 is valid. |
|
2024(04)LCX0533 Andhra Pradesh High Court Fluentgrid Limited |
HC stayed demand order challenging validity of extension for issuance of order u/s 73(10) CGST Act by N/No. 9/2023 and further stated that limitation period would be from 'due date' of filing annual returns rather than 'actual date' |