2025(01)LCX0476

Sree Venkateswara Medical

Versus

The Commercial Tax Officer

W.P.(MD).No. 31512 of 2024 decided on 02-01-2025

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED : 02.01.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

W.P.(MD).No.31512 of 2024
and
W.P.(MD)Nos.26392 and 26393 of 2024

Sree Venkateswara Medical,
Reprsented by its Proprietor,
Subbramaniyan Sureshkumar,
No.41, Velur Main Road,
Velayuthampalayam, Karur,
Tamil Nadu – 639 117.             ...Petitioner

        Vs

1.The Commercial Tax Officer,
Karur – 4 Assessment Circle,
Karur, Tamil Nadu.

2.The Deputy State Tax Officer – 1,
Karur – 4 Assessment Circle,
Karur, Tamil Nadu.             ... Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order of the first respondent in Reference No. ZA3302231108714 dated 22.02.2023 and quash the same, as the impugned proceedings is in violation of principles of natural justice, cryptic, arbitrary and further direct the respondent to restore and activate the registration of the petitioner under the TNGST Act, 2017.

For Petitioner : Ms.E.Ann Priscilla Swarnakumari

For Respondents : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar
                                Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

Heard Ms.E.Ann Priscilla Swarnakumari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.Suresh Kumar, learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents.

2. The present Writ Petition is filed challenging the order of the cancellation of the registration of the petitioner on the premise that the statutory returns has not been filed for a continuous period of six months, thereby invoking Section 29(2) of CGST Act.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the returns have been filed and the appropriate taxes have also been paid and the petitioner is ready to pay any further taxes that may be due, along with late fee and interest, as required under GST Act.

4. At the outset, it is submitted by both the learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents that the issue stands covered by a series of judgments, commencing with the decision in Tvl.Suguna Cutpiece Center Vs. Appellate Deputy Commissioner (ST) (GST) and others, wherein, under identical circumstances, this Court has directed the revocation of registration subject to conditions.

5. This Court has been consistently following the directions issued in Tvl.Suguna Cutpiece Center's case. Relevant portion of the order is extracted hereunder:

“229. In the light of the above discussion, these Writ Petitions are allowed subject to the following conditions:

i. The petitioners are directed to file their returns for the period prior to the cancellation of registration, if such returns have not been already filed, together with tax defaulted which has not been paid prior to cancellation along with interest for such belated payment of tax and fine and fee fixed for belated filing of returns for the defaulted period under the provisions of the Act, within a period of forty five (45) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, if it has not been already paid.

ii. It is made clear that such payment of Tax, Interest, fine / fee and etc. shall not be allowed to be made or adjusted from and out of any Input Tax Credit which may be lying unutilized or unclaimed in the hands of these petitioners.

iii. If any Input Tax Credit has remained utilized, it shall not be utilised until it is scrutinized and approved by an appropriate or a competent officer of the Department.

iv. Only such approved Input Tax Credit shall be allowed for being utilized thereafter for discharging future tax liability under the Act and Rule.

v. The petitioners shall also pay GST and file the returns for the period subsequent to the cancellation of the registration by declaring the correct value of supplies and payment of GST shall also be in cash.

vi. If any Input Tax Credit was earned, it shall be allowed to be utilised only after scrutinising and approving by the respondents or any other competent authority.

vii. The respondents may also impose such restrictions / limitation on petitioners as may be warranted to ensure that there is no undue passing of Input Tax Credit pending such exercise and to ensure that there is no violation or an attempt to do bill trading by taking advantage of this order. viii.On payment of tax, penalty and uploading of returns, the registration shall stand revived forthwith.

viii. On payment of tax, penalty and uploading of returns, the registration shall stand revived forthwith.

ix. The respondents shall take suitable steps by instructing GST Network, New Delhi to make suitable changes in the architecture of the GST Web portal to allow these petitioners to file their returns and to pay the tax/penalty/fine.

x. The above exercise shall be carried out by the respondents within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

xi. No cost.

xii. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.”

6. In view thereof, the benefit extended by this Court vide its earlier order in Suguna Cutpiece Centre's case cited supra, may be extended to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of on the above terms. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

02.01.2025

NCC:yes/no
Index:yes/no
Internet:yes/no
Nsr

To:

1.The Commercial Tax Officer,
Karur – 4 Assessment Circle,
Karur, Tamil Nadu.

2.The Deputy State Tax Officer – 1,
Karur – 4 Assessment Circle,
Karur, Tamil Nadu.

K.KUMARESH BABU , J.

W.P.(MD).No.31512 of 2024

02.01.2025