2025(02)LCX0003
Goodluck India Limited
Versus
Union of India
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1280 of 2025 decided on 03-02-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1280 of 2025
M/S GOODLUCK INDIA LIMITED
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Appearance:
MR BHAVESH B CHOKSHI(3109) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
DEEPAK N KHANCHANDANI(7781) for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3
MR ANKIT SHAH(6371) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE
BHARGAV D. KARIA
and
HONOURABLE
MR.JUSTICE D.N.RAY
Date : 03/02/2025
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA)
1. Heard learned advocate
Mr.Abhishek Rastogi through video conference with learned advocate Mr.Bhavesh B.
Chokshi for the petitioner and learned advocate Mr.Deepak N. Khanchandani for
the respondent Nos.2 and 3.
2. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the
petitioner has challenged the order dated 29.11.2024 passed by the Appellate
Authority under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for
short ‘the CGST Act’).
3.1. It was submitted by learned advocate Mr.Abhishek Rastogi for the
petitioner, at the outset, that this petition is preferred only to agitate the
condition to prefer an Appeal before the Tribunal in the impugned order passed
by the Appellate Authority that the petitioner is required to pay a sum equal to
25% of the remaining amount of tax in dispute in addition to the amount paid
under Section 107(6) of the CGST Act, 2017 arising from the said order in
relation to which the Appeal has been filed. It was submitted that, however, as
per the provisions of Section 112(8) of the GST Act as amended from 01.11.2024,
the petitioner is liable to pay only 10% of the amount of tax to prefer an
Appeal before the Tribunal.
3.2. It was therefore submitted that the petitioner may be relegated to file an
Appeal before the Tribunal under provisions of Section 112 of the GST Act with a
pre-depoiste amount of 10% as per the provisions of Section 112(8) of the GST
Act.
4. Considering the above submissions and in view of the alternative remedy
available to the petitioner under provisions of Section 112 of the GST Act, the
petition is not entertained. Issue of pre-deposite may be considered by the
Tribunal as and when such issue arises before the Tribunal in accordance with
law. The petition is accordingly disposed of.
(BHARGAV D. KARIA, J)
(D.N.RAY,J)