2019(07)LCX0134(AAR)
AAR-KARNATAKA
M/s Toolcomp Systems Private Limited
decided on 16/07/2019
THE AUTHORITY ON ADVANCE
RULINGS
IN KARNATAKA
GOODS AND SERVICES TAX
VANIJYA THERIGE KARYALAYA, KALIDASA ROAD
GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560009
Advance Ruling No. KAR ADRG 13/2019
Date : 16-07-2019
Present:
1. Sri. Harish Dhamia,
Additional Commissioner of Central Tax, .... Member (Central Tax)
2. Dr. Ravi Prasad M.P.
Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes .... Member (State Tax)
1. | Name and address of the applicant | M/s Toolcomp Systems Private Limited, #14-B, KIADB Industrial Area, 2nd Phase, Kumbalagodu, Kengeri Hobli, Bangalore - 560 074. |
2. | GSTIN or User ID | 29AACCT2521L1Z8 |
3. | Date of filing of Form GST ARA-01 | 16.10.2018 |
4. | Represented by | Sri. Shyam Bhat, Managing Director |
5. | Jurisdictional Authority - Centre | The Principal Commissioner of Central Tax, Bangalore West Commissionerate, Bengaluru - 560 070 (RANGE-EWD7) |
6. | Jurisdictional Authority - State | LGSTO-060, Bengaluru |
7. | Whether the payment of fees discharged and if yes, the amount and CIN | Yes, discharged fee of Rs.5,000/- under CGST Act vide CIN SBIN1802900174778, dated 16-10- 2018 and Rs 5,000/- under KGST Act vide CIN SBIN18042900390819 dated 25-04-2018 |
ORDER UNDER SECTION 98(4) OF
THE CENTRAL GOODS & SERVICES
TAX ACT, 2017 AND UNDER 98(4) OF THE KARNATAKA GOODS &
SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017
1. M/s. Toolcomp systems private
limited, #14-B, KIADB Industrial Area, 2nd Phase, Kumbalagodu, Kengeri Hobli,
Bangalore - 560 074, is a registered private limited company bearing GSTIN
number 29AACCT2521L1Z8, filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97
of CGST Act, 2017, KGST Act, 2017 read with rule 104 of CGST Rules, 2017 & KGST
Rules, 2017, in Form GST ARA-01 discharging the fee of Rs.5,000/ - each under
the CGST Act and the KGST Act, 2017.
2. The Applicant is a Private Limited Company, involved in the manufacture and
sale of plastic moulds, press tools, Jigs/ Fixtures / Gauges, Injection moulded
parts and Design services, as per the specific orders & requirements of their
customers. The Injection moulded parts (Tools), as per specific order from
customer, are manufactured using plastic Granules as Raw material and using
in-house injection moulding machines. The Applicant submits that the Tool is
either manufactured by them or supplied by the customers free of cost, for
production of parts, on returnable basis.
3. The Applicant further submits that the Injection moulds (Tools) supplied by
the customers at free of cost basis, for the manufacture of parts, on returnable
basis are classified under Capital goods. The mould (Tool) has specific life and
can produce only certain volume of total production. Every part produced has
incurred a portion of the mould (Tool) cost that appears as Transaction value,
if the Tool is provided by the Applicant, In the instant case the customer is
supplying the Tool on free of cost basis and hence the applicant is not charging
any portion of the cost of the Tool to the customer.
4. In view of the above, the Applicant seeks Advance Ruling on the following
question:
Clarification regarding applicability of Tool Amortisation cost (Transaction
Value) in GST Regime on Capital Goods received freely on returnable basis from
the recipients (Customer) for parts production and supply. This reference
particularly where the principal manufacturer provides moulds, dies, jigs and
fixtures or tools to the supplier for use in manufacturing process. The details
are furnished in a separate write-up and uploaded. The reference on this subject
is published in Economic Times dated 28.03-2018 and also uploaded.
PERSONAL HEARING: / PROCEEDINGS HELD ON 28.11.2018.
5. Sri. Shyam Bhat, Managing Director of the Applicant company appeared for
personal hearing proceedings on 28.11.2018, before this authority and reiterated
the facts narrated in their application. The applicant was requested to submit a
copy of the contract with the customer.
FINDINGS & DISCUSSION
We have considered the submissions made by the Applicant in their application
for advance ruling as well as the submissions made by Sri. Shyam Bhat, Managing
Director and authorised representative of the applicant during the personal
hearing. We have also considered the issue involved, on which advance ruling is
sought by the applicant and relevant facts. In response to the request to submit
a copy of the contract with their customer, the applicant submitted a copy of
the purchase order having the conditions of supply mentioned therein.
7. The Applicant seeks advance ruling as follows:
Clarification regarding applicability of Tool Amortisation cost (Transaction
Value) in GST Regime on Capital Goods received freely on returnable basis from
the recipients (Customer) for parts production and supply. This reference
particularly where the principal manufacturer provides moulds, dies, jigs and
fixtures or tools to the supplier for use in manufacturing process. The details
are furnished in a separate write-up and uploaded. The reference on this subject
is published in Economic Times dt 2803.2018 and also uploaded.
8. The applicant submitted a copy of their letter dated 22.08.2017 seeking
clarification from the Office of the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes,
Bangalore, as to whether GST is applicable on the tool transaction value (Tool
Amortisation cost) while supplying the parts to the customer though tool
amortization cost is not charged to the customer in the tax invoice. In this
letter the applicant further states that they are a Private Limited Company
involved in the manufacture and sale of plastic moulds, press tools, Jigs/
Fixtures / Gauges, Injection moulded parts and Design services, as per the
specific orders & requirements of their customers. The Injection moulded parts
(Tools), as per specific order from customer, are manufactured using plastic
Granules as Raw material and using in-house injection moulding machines. The
Applicant submits that the Tool is either manufactured by them or supplied by
the customers free of cost, for production of parts, on returnable basis.
Furthermore, the Injection moulds (Tools) supplied by the customers free of cost
basis, for the manufacture of parts, on returnable basis are classified under
Capital goods. The mould (Tool) has specific life and can produce only certain
volume of total production. Every part produced has incurred a portion of the
mould (Tool) cost that appears as Transaction value, if the Tool is provided by
the Applicant. In the instant case the customer is supplying the Tool on free of
cost basis and hence the applicant is not charging any portion of the cost of
the Tool to the customer.
9. In response to the request to the applicant to submit a copy of the contract
to examine the nature of supply of tools/ dies/ moulds etc the applicant
submitted a copy of the purchase order placed on them by Tata Autocomp Systems
Ltd.. The purchase order has standard terms and conditions of sale. Condition
number 32 is relevant to the subject matter. It reads as follows:
32. If required shall either supply the tooIs, patterns or jigs or fixtures
required for production of the parts to be supplied under this PO and / or
contract or pay for the manufacture of such tools, patterns or jigs or fixtures.
Such tools, patterns or jigs or fixtures supplied or paid by the purchaser Will
always remains the property of the purchaser and the vendor should use the same
exclusively for the purchaser parts and maintain the same at vendors cost and
will return the same to the purchaser after the completing the supply or as
instructed by the purchaser. In case vendor is adding any amount in the
assessable value towards the amortised value of tools supplied by the purchaser,
then this amortised value should not be added from 1st July 2017 onwards as from
1st July 2017 onwards the GST need to paid on the transaction value.
10. This condition is of very generic nature and does not bring forth whether
the tools have been supplied free of cost to the applicant or the applicant was
required to procure/manufacture. Therefore this condition stated in the purchase
order does not help in anyway in answering the question. We, therefore, resort
to examining the particulars given in the application.
11. In serial number 14 of the Application for Advance Ruling (Form GST ARA-01)
the applicant has narrated the question. This question is already highlighted in
para 7 above. Here the applicant contends that the tool/mould is received free
of cost and on returnable basis. This implies that the tool is provided free of
cost by Tata Autocomp Systems Ltd., and the applicant is bound to return the
same to them after completion of the supply or as instructed. In other words the
applicant is not under contract to supply components made by using the
tools/moulds belonging to them but the same have been supplied by Tata Autocomp
Systems Ltd., on FOC basis,
12. The CBIC in its Circular No.47/21/2018-GST dated 08.06.2018 has clarified
that Moulds and dies (Tools) owned by OEM that are provided to a component
manufacturer on FOC basis do not constitute supply as there is no consideration
and in such cases, the value of goods provided on FOC basis shall not be added
to the value of supply of components. However, in case the contractual
obligation is cast upon the component manufacturer to provide moulds/ dies but
the same have been provided by the OEM on FOC basis, then the amortized cost of
the moulds/dies is required to be added to the value of the components supplied.
13. In view of the above it is apparent that the issue raised by the applicant
is covered under Issue number I and Clarification 1.1 and 1.2 of the Circular
No.47/21/2018-GST dated 08.06.2018.
14. It is emphasised that this Ruling is based on examination of the contract /
purchase order furnished by the Applicant in the case of their customer M/s.
Tata Autocomp systems Ltd., (OEM) where the applicant is not under any
obligation to use their own tools/ moulds for manufacture of the components and
the same are supplied to them free of cost and on returnable basis. This ruling
will apply to other contracts entered into by the Applicant if and only if the
terms and conditions contained therein are the same as those contained in the
contract placed before us.
15. In view of the above, we pass the following.
RULING
The cost of the tool/s supplied by the OEM on FOC basis, under the situations discussed in para 11 and 14, to the Applicant is not required to be added to the value of the parts supplied by the Applicant and hence the said value is not liable for GST.
Harish Dharnia)
(Member)
(Dr.Ravi Prasad.M.P.)
Member
Place: Bengaluru
Date: 16.07.2019
To,
The Applicant
Copy to :
The Principal Chief Commissioner
of Central Tax, Bangalore Zone, Karnataka.
The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Karnataka, Bengaluru.
The Commissioner of Central Tax, Bangalore South Commissionerate, Bengaluru.
The Asst. Commissioner, LGSTO-25 A ,Bengaluru.
Office Folder.
Equivalent .