2019(09)LCX0183(AAR)
AAR-KARNATAKA
M/s Kwality Mobikes (P) Ltd.
decided on 24/09/2019
THE AUTHORITY ON ADVANCE
RULINGS
IN KARNATAKA
GOODS AND SERVICES TAX
VANIJYA THERIGE KARYALAYA, KALIDASA ROAD
GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560009
Advance Ruling No. KAR ADRG 76/2019
Date : 24-09-2019
Present:
1. Sri. Harish Dhamia,
Additional Commissioner of Central Tax, .... Member (Central Tax)
2. Dr. Ravi Prasad M.P.
Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes .... Member (State Tax)
1. | Name and address of the applicant | M/s Kwality Mobikes (P) Ltd., No. 162, 80 feet Main Road, Koramangala 4th Block, Bengaluru 560034 |
2. | GSTIN or User ID | 29AAGCK4555K2Z0 |
3. | Date of filing of Form GST ARA-01 | 23.01.2019 |
4. | Represented by | Sri K.V. Balasubramanyam, Chartered Accountant |
5. | Jurisdictional Authority - Centre | Commissioner of Central Tax, Bangalore South Commissionerate |
6. | Jurisdictional Authority - State | LGSTO-015 Bengaluru |
7. | Whether the payment of fees discharged and if yes, the amount and CIN | Yes, discharged fee of
1. Rs.5,000-00 under CGST Act vide CIN HDFC19012900168728 dated 16.01.2019 2. Rs.5,000-00 under KGST Act vide CIN HDFC19012900168728 dated 16.01.2019 |
ORDER UNDER SECTION 98(4) OF
THE CENTRAL GOODS & SERVICES
TAX ACT, 2017 AND UNDER 98(4) OF THE KARNATAKA GOODS &
SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017
1. M/s. Kwality Mobikes Private
Limited, (called as the Applicant hereinafter), having GSTIN number
29AAGCK4555K2Z0, has filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of
the CGST Act, 2017 and Section 97 of the KGST Act, 2017, in FORM GST ARA-01
discharging the fee of Rs.5,000-00 each under the CGST Act and the KGST Act.
2. The Applicant is a private limited company and is registered under the Goods
and Services Act, 2017. The applicant has sought advance ruling in respect of
the following question:
a) Whether the volume discount received on purchases is liable for GST? If yes,
under which HSN/SAC?
b) Whether volume discount received on retail (on sales) is liable for GST? If
yes, under which HSN /SAC?
c) Whether the Company has to issue taxable invoice to this effect?
3. The applicant furnishes some facts relevant to the stated activity:
a. The applicant states that he is in the business of supplying motor vehicles.
He is the authorised dealer for Harley-Davidson India (hereinafter called
authorised supplier¯) who manufactures high end two wheeler motorcycles. The
applicant in its regular course of business purchases the vehicles from the
authorised supplier wherein it charges 28% GST plus applicable Cess.
b. The Authorised supplier allows credit period of 30 days and also fixes sales
targets to the applicant. Besides, on purchase of vehicles which are over and
above the limit fixed on regular purchases, the applicant is also eligible for
volume discount, which is paid on monetary terms.
c. Hence, the company is eligible for Volume Discount on retail i.e. Sales
Commission) and on purchases over and above the target is eligible for Regular
Volume Discount (i.e. on purchases). The authorised supplier issues Credit Note
and this credit note is not affecting the purchase price or sale price and hence
has no effect on GST collected in the invoices.
4. FINDINGS & DISCUSSION:
We have considered the submissions made by the applicant in their application
for advance ruling as well as the additional submissions made by Sri. KV
Balasubramanyam, CA, during the personal hearing. We also considered the issues
involved on which advance ruling is sought by the applicant and relevant facts.
At the outset, we would like to state that the provisions of both the CGST Act
and the KGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a
mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the
CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provisions under the KGST Act.
4.1 The transaction of the applicant is examined and found that the authorised
supplier is issuing a tax invoice on the supply of goods to the applicant and
the applicant is taking credit of the input tax charged in the invoice. The
applicant when makes more purchases is eligible for the volume discount on
purchases and a credit note is issued by the authorised supplier and no
adjustment of price is made in respect of the goods already sold nor any
adjustment of GST is made in the credit note. The applicant is also not claiming
any reduction in input tax credit already claimed by him as it does not affect
the price of the goods sold. Hence, the amount received by the applicant is in
the form of an incentive provided by the authorised supplier and does not affect
the sale price of the goods already sold and hence there is no liability to
charge GST on the same.
4.2 Further, the applicant when sells more than his target is eligible for the
incentive which is provided by the authorised supplier in the form of a credit
note without affecting the sale price of the goods purchased or sold. Even this
is in the form of incentive and no adjustment of price nor tax is done either by
the applicant or the authorised supplier. Hence, the amount received by the
applicant is in the form of an incentive provided by the authorised supplier and
does not affect the sale price of the goods already sold and hence there is no
liability to charge GST on the same.
4.3 Further, the applicant is not providing any service to the authorised
supplier and is only receiving the incentive. Indirectly, it has an effect on
the sale price of the goods purchased by the applicant from the authorised
supplier and is actually in the form of discount. But Section 15(3) of the CGST
Act, 2017 states as under:
(3) The value of the supply shall not include any discount which is given, -
(a) before or at the time of the supply if such discount has been duly recorded
in the invoice issued in respect of such supply; and
(b) after the supply has been effected, if -
(i) such discount is established in terms of an agreement entered into at or
before the time of such supply and specifically linked to relevant invoices; and
(ii) input tax credit as is attributable to the discount on the basis of
document issued by the supplier has been reversed by the recipient of the
supply.¯
Since the credit note is issued as a post sale event, the same is not covered
under the clause (a) of the above provision. Further, the applicant has not
reversed the input tax credit attributable to the discount received in the form
of credit note from the authorised supplier, the same cannot be covered under
clause (b) above. Hence in view of the above, the credit note issued by the
supplier in the pertinent case does not have any effect on the value of supply
and hence is only a financial document for account adjustment for the incentive
provided. Hence there is no effect on the GST.
5. In view of the foregoing, we rule as follows
RULING
1. The Volume Discount received
on purchases in the form of credit note without any adjustment of GST is not
liable for GST.
2. The Volume Discount received on Retail (on sales) in the form of credit note
without any adjustment of GST is not liable for GST.
3. Since the amount received in the form of credit note is actually a discount
and not a supply by the applicant to the authorised supplier, the applicant need
not issue tax invoice for this transaction.
Harish Dharnia)
(Member)
(Dr.Ravi Prasad.M.P.)
Member
Place: Bengaluru
Date: 24.09.2019
To,
The Applicant
Copy to:
1. The Principal Chief
Commissioner of Central Tax, Bangalore Zone, Karnataka.
2. The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Karnataka, Bengaluru.
3. The Commissioner of Central Tax, Bangalore South, Bengaluru.
4. The Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, LGSTO-015, Bengaluru
5. Office Folder
Equivalent .