2019(07)LCX0127(AAR)
AAR-RAJASTHAN
M/s Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited
decided on 30/07/2019
RAJASTHAN AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE
RULING
GOODS AND SERVICES TAX
KAR BHAWAN, AMBEDKAR CIRCLE,
NEAR
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
JAIPUR - 302005 (RAJASTHAN)
ADVANCE RULING NO. RAJ/AAR/2019-20/16
J.P.Meena Additional Commissioner | : | Member (Central Tax) |
Hemant Jain Joint Commissioner | : | Member (State Tax) |
Name and address of the applicant | : |
M/s Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited, 1, Vidyut Bhawan, Janpath, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302005 |
GSTIN of the applicant | : | 08AABCR8312A1ZT |
Clause(s) of Section 97(2) ofCGST/SGST Act, 2017, under which the question(s) raised | : | (b) applicability of a notification
issued under the provisions of this Act; (c) determination of time and value of supply of goods or services or both; (g) whether any particular thing done by the applicant with respect to any goods or services or both amounts to or results in a supply of goods or services or both, within the meaning of that term. |
Date of Personal Hearing | : | 17.07.2019 |
Present for the applicant | : | Shri Vikash Gupta, C.A. & Shri Virendra Pariwal, C.A. (Authorised Representatives) |
Date of Ruling | : | 29.07.2019 |
Note: Under Section 100 of the CGST/ RGST Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling constituted under section 99 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order.
At the outset, we would like to
make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the RGST Act are the
same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically
made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean
a reference to the same provision under the RGST Act. Further to the earlier,
henceforth for the purposes of this Advance Ruling, a reference to such a
similar provision under the CGST Act / RGST Act would be mentioned as being
under the "GST Act".
The issue raised by M/s Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited, 1,
Vidyut Bhawan, Janpath, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302005 (hereinafter the applicant) is
fit to pronounce advance ruling as it falls under the ambit of the Section 97(2)
(b), (c) & (g) given as under :
(b) applicability of a notification issued under the provisions of this Act;
(c) determination of time and value of supply of goods or services or both;
(g) whether any particular thing done by the applicant with respect to any goods
or services or both amounts to or results in a supply of goods or services or
both, within the meaning of that term.
Further, the applicant being a registered person (GSTIN is 08AABCR8312A1ZT as
per the declaration given by him in Form ARA-01) the issue raised by the
applicant is neither pending for proceedings nor proceedings were passed by any
authority. Based on the above observations, the applicant is admitted to
pronounce advance ruling.
1. SUBMISSION AND
INTERPRETATION OF THE APPLICANT:
The applicant is a company registered under the companies act 1956 vide
registration no 17-016485 of 2000-2001 (CIN No. U40109RJ2000SGC016485) with its
registered office at Vidyut Bhawan, Janpath, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302005. It was
established on 19 July 2000 by Government of Rajasthan under the provisions of
the Rajasthan Power Sector Reforms Act, 1999 as the successor company of
erstwhile Rajasthan State Electricity Board (RSEB).
Under the provision of the Electricity Act, 2003, RVPN has been declared as
State Transmission Utility (STU) by Government of Rajasthan. As per section 40
of The Electricity Act, 2003, the duty of a transmission licensee is to build,
maintain and operate an efficient, coordinated and economical inter-State
transmission system or intra-State transmission system. As the RVPN is a
transmission licensee and being an owner of its transmission system, the
exclusive right of modification/ augmentation/ shifting/ additions to its
transmission system (hereinafter referred as Deposit Work) remains with RVPN.
Further, section 34 of Electricity Act 2003 deals with Grid Standards and it
stipulates that every transmission licensee shall comply with such technical
standards, of operation and maintenance of transmission lines, in accordance
with the Grid Standards, as may be specified by the Central Electricity
Authority. Relevant extracts of aforesaid provisions of the Electricity Act 2003
are as under:-
Section 40 - Duties of transmission licensees
It shall be the duty of a transmission licensee-
a) to build, maintain and operate an efficient, coordinated and economical
inter-State transmission system or intra-State transmission system, as the case
may be;
b) to comply with the directions of the Regional Load Dispatch Centre and the
State Load Dispatch Centre as the case may be;
c) to provide non-discriminatory open access to its transmission system for use
by-
(i) any licensee or generating company on payment of the transmission charges;
or
(ii) any consumer as and when such open access is provided by the State
Commission under sub-section (2) of section 42, on payment of the transmission
charges and a surcharge thereon, as may be specified by the State Commission:
Section 34 - Grid Standards
Every transmission licensee shall comply with such technical standards, of
operation and maintenance of transmission lines, in accordance with the Grid
Standards, as may be specified by the Authority.
As a transmission licensee, RVPN is required to develop transmission system in
the State of Rajasthan and provides the pathway for power within whole of
Rajasthan. RVPN owns, builds, maintains and operates the high-voltage electric
transmission system that helps to keep the lights on, businesses running and
communities strong. RVPN also owns the shared generating projects as
representative of erstwhile RSEB. The main source of revenue of RVPN is the
Transmission Charges as per tariff decided by the Rajasthan Electricity
Regulatory Commission (RERC), which are recovered from the State DISCOMS and
other customers against services of Transmission of electricity through the
Transmission system. The transmission system so developed is accounted for as
Fixed Assets in the books of RVPN to be depreciated over a useful life as per
RERC Tariff Regulations. Simultaneously the Transmission charges are recovered
as per Tariff approved by the RERC against services of Transmission of
electricity through the Transmission system. In terms of GST Notification
No.12/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June 2017, as amended, the services of
transmission of Power by an electricity transmission utility are subject to NIL
rate of GST.
In addition to the principal activity of providing services of Transmission of
electricity, the applicant is also providing services in the form of Deposit
Works for various consumers/ intending agencies, which comprise deposit works to
the existing transmission system of the applicant. Sometimes additions are made
to the existing transmission system of the applicant or the existing system is
modified/ augmented/ shifted on the specific request of the consumer/ intending
agency, which is termed as Deposit Works by the applicant. The consumer/
intending agency asks for the addition to the transmission system of the
applicant generally for the places where such transmission system does not exist
or some time asks for modification/ shifting of transmission system from one
place to another as per their specific requirements. As discussed aforesaid, as
per Regulatory requirement of Electricity Act 2003, since the exclusive right of
deposit work to the applicants transmission system remains with the applicant
and it has also to comply with the technical Grid standards of operation and
maintenance of transmission lines specified by the Central Electricity
Authority, the deposit work to the applicants transmission system is carried
out on the request of consumer/intending agency under two methods/options, i.e.
either whole work is executed by the applicant or the whole work is executed by
the consumer/ intending agency under the supervision of the applicant.
As per Order No.RVPN/AAO/F&R/F. 2 (Pt.-X) /D.28 dated 08/05/2019 (F&R No. 1277)
(copy attached), the applicant issued instructions for deposit works of
consumer/ intending agency under both options, in which the details for
procedure of cost estimation, applicable supervision charges and procedure for
settlement of final accounts etc. are given. As per the said order, consumer/
intending agency on the applicants supervision basis is permitted to execute
the deposit works to the transmission system of the applicant. The Order also
states that the work executed under the deposit work by consumers/ intending
agencies under supervision of the applicant shall become part of the applicants
transmission system.
Under both options the ownership of the transmission system after execution of
deposit works shall remain with the applicant in the capacity of a State
transmission licensee as per the provisions of the Electricity Act 2003. In case
of services of deposit works, the cost of services is calculated by the
applicant as per the estimation methodology which includes Hard cost (material &
labour), overhead charges, other charges etc. Under the deposit works, the
applicant is facilitating the transmission system for the consumers/ intending
agencies against recovery of the amount as per approved estimation mechanism.
For facilitating such deposit work to the transmission system on the specific
request of the consumers/ intending agencies, the applicant generally charges
the following amount as a consideration:
Charges for modification/ augmentation/ shifting/ additions to transmission
system - These are the cost incurred under deposit works requiring modification/
augmentation/ shifting/ additions to the transmission system.
Supervision Charges
Shut down charges
Modification/ augmentation/ shifting/ additions to the applicants Transmission
System on the request of consumers/ intending agencies is carried out by
adopting two options/ methods:-
1. When whole work is done by the applicant itself at the requirement/ instance
of the consumer/ intending agency.
In this case the whole cost is incurred by the applicant and such cost including
other charges/ overheads plus GST is recovered by the applicant from the
consumer/ intending agency. Being a transmission licensee, the ownership of the
transmission system requiring modification/ augmentation/ shifting/ additions
remains with the applicant even though the cost/ charges are borne by the
intending agency/ consumer. The applicant being the owner of such transmission
system is accounting in its books by creating Asset on one hand and Income on
the other hand.
2. When work is to be done at the requirement/ instance of the consumer/
intending agency on supervision basis, i.e. work is got done by the consumer/
intending agency itself under the supervision of applicant.
Under this option the whole expenditure is directly incurred by the consumer/
intending agency itself, however, such consumer/ intending agency is responsible
for getting the design/ drawings approved from the applicant for material/ work
and to arrange for inspection of material at manufacturers site, if required by
the applicant. Under this option the consumer[intending agency is required to
pay supervision charges to the applicant calculated at fixed % on the total cost
estimate and shutdown charges with GST. A demand note is also raised for GST on
total cost estimate, i.e. on the value of asset/ infrastructure built/ modified
by the consumer/ intending agency itself by treating the amount incurred by it
as value of supply of service in accordance with Section 15(2)(b) of the GST Act
2017.
The deposit works of Transmission system on supervision basis generally involves
following actions:-
a. All work is supervised by the competent team of RVPN.
b. The work has to be got done as per the norms of the RVPN.
c. The Consumer/ Indenting agency is responsible for getting the design/
drawings approved from RVPN for material/work and shall arrange for inspection
of material at manufacturers site, if required by RVPN.
d. In case of work involving modification/ shifting of the existing Transmission
Asset/ Infrastructure, the new transmission asset/ infrastructure is built/
created first at a particular trench (where modification is required) so that
the electricity supply in the related areas is not affected. After completion of
such work of new transmission asset/ infrastructure, shutdown (of electric flow)
takes place for disconnecting old line at a particular trench (where
modification is required) and connecting new line.
The old asset/ Infrastructure (Line) is then dismantled. Therefore, practically
new asset/ infrastructure is created even in case of shifting/ modification. The
applicant also remains the owner of the dismantled material/ scrap.
e. Being a transmission licensee under the Electricity Act 2003, the applicant
will be the owner of the asset/ infrastructure built/ modified even though the
cost/charges are borne by the intending agency/ consumer.
f. Therefore, under both the methods/ options, the ownership of the asset/
infrastructure built/modified remains with the applicant only is being a
Transmission Licensee under the Electricity Act 2003. The only procedural
difference in the two methods/options is that in the first option, the complete
deposit works are executed directly by the applicant with recovery of costs as
per cost estimate with taxes and in the second option the work is got executed
by the consumer/ intending agency under supervision of the applicant. The cost
is directly incurred by the consumer/ intending agency, still the applicant is
exclusively liable and responsible for modification/ alteration of the
transmission infrastructure as per Electricity Act 2003 so as to comply with the
grid standards and thats why the work is mandatorily to be executed under the
supervision of the applicant. Thus according to Section 15(2)(b) of GST Act,
2017, the cost of such asset/ infrastructure incurred by the consumer/ intending
agency is to be included in the value of supply. However, certain consumers /
intending agencies are of the view that GST should not be charged by the
applicant on the cost incurred by customer/ intending agency directly.
2. QUESTIONS ON WHICH THE ADVANCE RULING IS SOUGHT:
Whether facilitating the execution of works requiring modification/
augmentation/ shifting/ additions to the transmission system of RVPN at the
specific request of the consumer/intending agency under Deposit Work is a
Supply in terms of Section 7 of the CGST Act, 2017?
If the Deposit Work as aforesaid is a Supply, what shall be the value of the
supply in terms of Section 15 of the GST Act, 2017 in the event of :
a. Work executed by RVPN itself.
b. Work executed by the consumer/ intending agency under supervision of RVPN.
What would be the applicable GST tax rate on the above supply?
3. PERSONAL HEARING
In the matter personal hearing was granted to the applicant on 17.07.2019 at
Room no. 2.29 NCRB, Statue Circle, Jaipur. On behalf of the applicant Shri
Vikash Gupta, C.A. and Shri Virendra Pariwal, C.A. (Authorized Representatives)
appeared for PH. During the PH, they reiterated the submissions already made in
the applications and requested for early disposal of the application.
4. COMMENTS OF THE JURISDICTIONAL OFFICER
The jurisdiction officer (State Tax, Special Circle-I, Zone-III, Sambhagiya Kar
Bhawan, Jhalana Institutional Area, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302004) has submitted his
comments vide letter dated 03.07.2019 and stated that,
a. Since the taxable person is executing works requiring modification/
augmentation/ shifting/ additions to the transmission system for the consumer
and cost or charges are collected from the consumer and the above activity is
being carried out in the course of business i.e. the transmission of power to
the consumer, it would be covered under the scope of sub-section (1) of section
7 of the RGST Act, 2017 as supply of services.
b. Value of supply in case: a) works executed by RVPN itself shall as per
sub-section 1 of Section 15 of RGST Act, 2017 would be transaction value, which
is the price actually paid or payable for the said supply.
b) Work executed by the consumer/ intending agency under supervision of RVPN
shall as per sub-section 1 of Section 15 of RGST Act, 2017 would be transaction
value which is the price actually paid or payable for the said supply to the
intending agency whether by the consumer itself directly because it is
immaterial who makes payment but actually work is executed on behalf of RVPN who
is solely responsible to provide the above said service as per Electricity Act,
2003.
c. Since the execution of works requiring modification/ augmentation/ shifting/
additions to the transmission of RVPN falls under the category of works
contract, the supply is of services and accordingly the applicable GST tax rate
would be equal to the rate as applicable on the supply of services.
5. FINDINGS, ANALYSIS & CONCLUSION:
a. We observe that, the applicant is engaged in providing services/ facilitation
to customers/ intending agencies under Deposit Works to the RVPNs transmission
system in two options. Under the first option where complete work is executed by
the applicant itself for customer/ intending agency, complete cost incurred by
the applicant (comprising of material cost, labour charges, overhead and other
charges) is recovered from the consumer/ intending agency along with GST. Under
the second option, the customer/ intending agency executes the work itself under
the supervision of the applicant.
b. While going through the submissions, we find that as per section 40 of
Electricity Act 2003, the duty of transmission licensee is to build, maintain
and operate an efficient, coordinated and economical transmission system.
Further as per section 34, every transmission licensee is required to comply
with the technical grid standards, of operation and maintenance of transmission
lines as specified by the Central Electricity Authority. As the applicant is a
State transmission licensee under the Electricity Act 2003, therefore it owns
the transmission system/ infrastructure with exclusive right and responsibility
of its deposit work of transmission lines.
c. When deposit work is done by the consumer/ intending agency itself under the
supervision of the applicant. Under this option the consumer/ intending agency
is required to pay supervision charges to the applicant calculated at fixed % on
the total cost estimate and shutdown charges along with GST. A demand note by
the applicant is raised for GST on total cost estimate, i.e. on the value of
deposit work by the consumer/ intending agency itself by treating the amount
incurred by it as value of supply of service in accordance with section 15(2)(b)
of the GST Act 2017. Being a transmission licensee under the Electricity Act
2003, the applicant will be the owner of the asset/ infrastructure built/
modified even though the cost/charges are borne by the intending agency/
consumer. Thereby, as per the terms of RVPN Order No. RVPN/AAO/F&R/F. 2 (Pt.-X)
/D.28 dated 08/05/2019 (F&R No. 1277), the asset/ infrastructure built/ modified
by the intending agency/ consumer under supervision of the applicant is required
to be transferred to applicant and any expenditure or taxes incurred or to be
incurred by the applicant is to be borne by the consumer/ intending agency. In
this transaction, though the expenditure in actual is incurred by the consumer/
intending agency but the applicant being the owner of the asset/ infrastructure
under Regulations, account it in its books by creating Asset on one hand and
Income on the other hand as a Consumer Contribution.
In other words we observe that even though the expenditure and the work in
actual is done by the consumer / intending agency but the same will be treated
as the work has been done by the applicant.
d. Therefore, under both the methods/ options, the ownership of the asset/
infrastructure built/ modified remains with the RVPN only. It is also pertinent
to mention here that both these cases are transactions of supply of pure
services and there is no supply of goods. The only procedural difference in the
two methods/options is that in the first option, the complete deposit works are
executed directly by RVPN with recovery of costs as per cost estimate plus taxes
and in the second option the work is got executed by the consumer/ intending
agency itself (by incurring costs directly) under the supervision of RVPN with
payment of supervision & other charges with taxes along with tax on the value of
asset/ infrastructure built/ modified by the consumer/ intending agency itself,
by treating it as value of supply of service in accordance with section 15(2)(b)
of the CGST Act 2017.
e. The term supply has been defined in section 7 of GST Act, 2017 and it
includes all forms of supply (goods or services) and includes agreeing to supply
when they are for a consideration and in the course or furtherance of business.
It specifically includes sale, transfer, barter, exchange, license, rental,
lease or disposal. For a transaction to qualify as supply, it is essential
that the same is in the course or furtherance of business. For the purpose of
transaction to be covered under the Scope of Supply under section 7(1)(a) of GST Act, 2017, following four components are important:
There must be any one of the forms of supply, involved, viz. of sale, transfer,
barter, exchange, license, rental, lease or disposal.
Such supply should be for a consideration.
It should be made by a person (supplier).
It should be in the course of or in furtherance of business.
In the instant case, the transaction of facilitating the execution of deposit
works to the applicants transmission system at the specific request of the
consumer/ intending agency is included under the scope of supply in terms of
section 7 of GST Act, 2017 as the same fulfills all the essential ingredients of
supply as it is a supply of service in the form of facilitation, further there
is a consideration as the construction activities carried out by the customer /
intending agency will ultimately be the property of the applicant. Also the
applicant by facilitating the access to its transmission system becomes the
supplier of services and the activities are duly in the course of furtherance of
business. Thus all the ingredients of section 7(1)(a) are present to be
categorized the transaction as supply of services.
Considering the fact that the ownership of asset remains with the applicant, it
is evident that the execution of works requiring deposit works is a facilitation
for the access/ use of such transmission system and thus such facilitation is a
supply of services.
f. Further act of facilitating the execution of deposit work falls under the
term to do an act as specified in clause (e) of para 5 of Schedule II referred
in section 7 to the GST Act 2017. Same is reproduced as under:-
Section 7
(1A) Where certain activities or transactions constitute a supply in accordance
with the provisions of sub-section (1), they shall be treated either as supply
of goods or supply of services as referred to in Schedule II.
Schedule II (Section 7): Activities or transactions to be treated as supply of
goods or supply of services:
Para 5, clause (e) - agreeing to the obligation to refrain from an act, or to
tolerate an act or a situation, or to do an act; shall be treated as supply of
service.
Thus in our view the act of facilitating the execution of works requiring
modification/ augmentation/ shifting/ additions to the applicants transmission
system are a supply of services.
g. In a contract of supply of services, there are two parties, i.e. supplier of
services and recipient of services. In respect of supply of goods or services,
three methods of payment have been considered- by way of money, goods in kind,
services in kind. Thus, consideration includes the payment in money, payment in
kind through goods, and payment in kind through provision of services.
In the instant case, as per applicants view, the applicant is the supplier and
the consumer/ intending agency is the recipient of service.
h. In the instant case, the services of facilitating the deposit work to the
applicants transmission system on specific request of the consumer/ intending
agency for a consideration is subject to charge of GST as the following
conditions are satisfied -
(i) Services are provided by one person (RVPN) to another person
(consumer/intending agency).
(ii) Services are not in the exempted list.
(iii) Services are provided in taxable territory.
For this service of facilitating the recipient, the applicant is receiving the
consideration from intending agency/ consumer in three components:-
supervision charges (in cash);
shutdown charges (in cash); and
ownership of asset created due to deposit work (in kind/ barter - the cost
thereto is directly incurred by the consumer/ intending agency and practically
new asset/ infrastructure is created even in case of modification/ shifting as
discussed aforesaid).
In case this deposit work is to be executed directly by the applicant, the
consideration to be received from the consumer/ intending agency would be total
cost estimate (including overhead & other charges) with GST (i.e. in cash).
i. section 15 of the GST Act, 2017 deals with valuation of supply of goods and
services. Valuations under the GST law refer to value of taxable supply. The
value of a supply of goods or services shall be the transaction value, that is
the price actually paid or payable for the said supply of goods and/or services
where the Supplier and the recipient of the supply are not related and the price
is the sole consideration for the supply. The value of supply shall include
amount that the applicant is liable to pay but which has been incurred by the
recipient, by reason of, or in connection with the new infrastructure created.
In the present case where the deposit work is undertaken by the consumer/
intending agency under supervision of the applicant, the cost is directly
incurred by the consumer/ intending agency, still the applicant is exclusively
liable and responsible for modification/ alteration of the transmission
infrastructure as per Electricity Act, 2003 so as to comply with the grid
standards and thats why the work is mandatorily to be executed under the
supervision of applicant. Thus as per the above discussions, since the applicant
is liable and responsible for such work, therefore, according to section
15(2)(b) of GST Act, 2017, the cost of such asset/ infrastructure incurred by
the consumer/ intending agency is to be included in the value of supply.
Therefore, in view of the above discussion, the transaction of facilitating the
execution of deposit works to the applicants transmission system at the
specific request of the consumer/ intending agency amounts to supply in terms
of section 7 of GST Act, 2017 as the same fulfills all the essential ingredients
of supply, more particularly when the ownership of asset remains with the
applicant, the deposit work is a facilitation for the access/use of such
transmission system and thus in our view such facilitation amounts to supply
of services.
j. Therefore, in addition to supervision/ shutdown charges, by virtue of section
15(2)(b) of GST Act, 2017 the cost incurred by the consumer/ intending agency,
for creating the infrastructure is also required to be included in the
transaction value and to be considered as value of supply for the purpose of
levy of GST.
When the applicant incurred such cost, then GST would automatically be leviable
on total transaction value without any recourse to section 15(2)(b) of GST Act,
2017.
Accordingly, even when the cost of deposit work to the applicants transmission
system is incurred by the consumer/ intending agency itself, such cost is also
required to be included in the transaction value and to be considered as value
of supply for the purpose of levy of GST in terms of section 15(2)(b).
k. In our view, the transaction of facilitating the execution of works (Deposit
Work) to the applicants transmission system at the specific request of the
consumer/ intending agency is covered under the scope of supply in terms of
section 7 of CGST Act, 2017.
As the deposit work itself is a supply, in the event of work executed by the
applicant itself, Value of Supply in terms of Section 15 of the GST Act 2017
shall be the total cost estimate (including overhead & other charges) as per
Section 15 of the CGST Act, 2017.
In the Second Option, Work executed by the consumer/ intending agency under
supervision of RVPN Value of Supply in terms of Section 15 of the GST Act 2017
shall comprise-:
(i) Supervision charges;
(ii) Shutdown charges;
(iii) The cost directly incurred by the consumer/ intending agency.
Further, we observe that Services provided by the applicant to the consumer/
intending agency falls under HSN/SAC 998631 and will attract GST @ (SGST 9% +
CGST 9%), as per Annexure to Notification No.11/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated
28th June 2017 (as amended).
6. In view of the foregoing, we rule as follows:-
RULING
Facilitating the execution of
work (Deposit Work) by the applicant to the consumer/ intending agency is
covered under the scope of supply in terms of section 7 of GST Act, 2017.
In both the cases as mentioned by the applicant, value shall be the transaction
value, that is the price actually paid or payable in terms of Section 15 of the
GST Act 2017.
The rate of GST shall be 18% (SGST 9% +CGST 9%).
J.P.MEENA
Member
(Central Tax)
HEMANT JAIN
Member
(State Tax)
SPEED POST
M/s Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Limited, 1, Vidyut Bhawan, Janpath, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302005
Dated: 30.07.2019
F.No. AAR/RVPNL/2019-20/116-19
Copy to:-
1. Commissioner, State Tax, Kar Bhawan, Bhawani Singh Road, Ambedkar Circle,
C-Scheme-, Jaipur 302005.
2. Commissioner, Central Tax, Jaipur Commissionerate, NCRB, Statue Circle,
Jaipur, Rajasthan 302005.
3. Deputy Commissioner, State Tax, Special Circle-1, Zone-Ill, Sambhagiya Kar
Bhawan, Jhalana Institutional Area, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302004.
Equivalent .