2018(08)LCX0098(AAR)
AAR-MAHARASHTRA
DRS MARINE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED
decided on 24/08/2018
MAHARASHTRA AUTHORITY FOR
ADVANCE RULING
GST Bhavan, 8th floor, H-Wing, Mazgaon, Mumbai - 400010.
(Constituted under section 96 of the Maharashtra Goods and Services
Tax Act, 2017)
BEFORE THE BENCH OF
(1) Shri B.V. Borhade Addl. Commissioner of
Central Tax, (Member)
(2) Shri Pankaj Kumar Joint Commissioner of State Tax,( Member)
GSTIN Number, if any/ User-id | 27AADCM694 SMIZZ | |
Legal Name of Applicant | DRS MARINE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED | |
Registered Address/Address provided while obtaining user id | 506, Great Eastern Summit, 5th floor, Plot No. 56, Sector 15, CBD Belapur, Navi Mumbai - 400614 | |
Details of application | GST-ARA, Application No. 34 Dated 07.06.2018 | |
Concerned officer | Dy. Commr. of SGST(RAI-VAT-E-008) Raigad Division, Belapur, Navi Mumbai | |
Nature of activity(s) (proposed / present) in respect of which advance ruling sought | ||
A | Category | Bonded Ware House |
B | Description (in brief) |
We have been into selecting and recruiting the shipping personnel on behalf of Foreign Ship Owner. And have been charging Administration fees for the same and paying GST on the Administration charges so received. |
Issue/s on which advance ruling required | (v) determination of the liability to pay tax on any goods or services or both | |
Question(s) on which advance ruling is required | As reproduced in para 01 of the Proceedings below. |
PROCEEDINGS
(Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax
Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
The present application has
been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred
to as the Act and MGST Act¯] by Drs marine services private limited, the
applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following issue.
Whether GST is applicable on Reimbursement of salary on behalf of
foreign entity.¯
At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both
the CGST Act and the MGST Act are the same except for certain provisions.
Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar
provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the
same provision under the MGST Act. Further to the earlier, henceforth for
the purposes of this Advance Ruling, a reference to such a similar provision
under the CGST Act / MGST Act would be mentioned as being under the GST
Act¯.
02 FACTS AND CONTENTION - AS PER THE APPLICANT
The submissions, as reproduced verbatim, could be seen thus-
STATEMENT OF THE RELEVANT FACTS HAVING A BEARING ON THE QUESTIONS:
We are Crew Recruitment & Placement Agency operating from Belapur, Navi
Mumbai having GST Regn No. 27AADCM6918M1ZZ. We have been into selecting &
recruiting the shipping personnel on behalf of Foreign Ship Owner & have
been charging Administration fees for the same & paying GST on the
Administration charges so received.
The Reserve Bank of India vide its Circular no. 15 dated 24.09.2015¯ has
allowed for opening of Foreign Currency Account by Ship Manning/ Crew
Management Agencies. According to the circular the credit to such foreign
currency account would be through normal banking channels from the overseas
principal and the debits would be towards various local expenses in
connection with the management of Ships/Crew in the ordinary course of
business. (A copy of the said RBI Circular is attached herewith for ready
reference).
In view of the said RBI Circular, our principal has requested us for
disbursal of salary to the crew members from our side. For this the
principal would be transferring the sum of total salary to us and we will be
disbursing the salary to the crew member through banking channels into their
respective accounts. For this activity we would be charging/ invoicing
service charges to the principal and on the said charges we would be
discharging our GST liability.
In view of Rule 33 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017, the
expenditure or costs incurred by a supplier as a Pure Agent of the recipient
of supply shall be excluded from the value of the supply. Since the activity
would be done on behalf of the Foreign Principal and we would not be
deducting any charges from the amount of salary received for disbursement,
the amount so remitted towards disbursal of salary would not be taxable
under GST in view of provisions of Rule 33 of the CGST Rules, 2017.
Therefore we would be carrying out the said activity, after amending our
contract with the principal. If anything contrary to the said provisions
exists, kindly let us know so that we are able to properly follow the Rules
and correctly pay the taxes.
STATEMENT CONTAINING APPLICANTS INTERPRETATION OF LAW IN RESPECT OF THE
QUESTIONS RAISED
Opening of foreign currency accounts in India by ship-manning / crew
management agencies
Attention of Authorised Dealer Category-1 (AD Category - 1) banks is invited
to Regulation 6 of Foreign Exchange Management (Foreign Currency Accounts by
a person resident in India) Regulations, 2000 notified vide Notfn No. FEMA
10/2000-RB dtd May 3, 2000, as amended from time to time, & A.P. (DIR
Series) Circular No. 48 dtd April 30, 2007, in terms of which general
permission is available to ship-manning/ crew managing agencies that are
rendering services to shipping/ airline companies incorporated outside
India, to open, hold and maintain non-interest bearing foreign currency
account with an AD Category - I bank in India for meeting the local expenses
in India of such shipping or airline company.
2. With a view to ensuring strict compliance, our guidelines on the
operations in such foreign currency accounts opened with AD Category-I banks
by foreign shipping or airline companies or their agents in India are
reproduced below:
a) Credits to such foreign currency accounts would be only by way of freight
or passage fare collections in India or in ward remittances through normal
banking channels from the overseas principal. Debits will be toward Various
local expenses in connection with the management of the ships / crew in the
ordinary course of business.
b) No credit facility (fund based or non-fund based) should be granted
against security of funds held in such accounts.
c) The bank should meet the prescribed reserve requirements in respect of
balances in such accounts.
d) NO EEFC facility should be allowed in respect of the remittances received
in these accounts.
e) These foreign currency accounts will be maintained only during the
validity period of the agreement.
3. AD Category - I banks may bring the contents of this circular to the
notice of their constituents and customers concerned.
4. The directions contained in this Circular have been issued under Section
10 (4) and 11 (1) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (42 of 1999)
and are without prejudice to permissions / approvals, if any, required under
any other law.
03. CONTENTION - AS PER THE CONCERNED OFFICER
The submission, as reproduced verbatim, could be seen thus-
The taxable person M/S DRS MARINE SERVICES PVT. LTD has approached your good
offices for an advance ruling to determine liability to pay tax on a
transaction of service. In context of this application it is submitted that-
The applicant DRS MARINE SERVICES PVT. LTD is a company incorporated under
the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at Mumbai, Maharashtra.
The Applicants nature of services are Manpower Recruitment Services (HSN
Code: 99851).
The applicant was providing services of manpower recruitment to M/S RMS Ltd,
Bermuda. The applicant wef 05-07-2018 by way of addendum provides further
services.
The additional Services and Fees are being incorporated as an addendum as
follows:
2. Fee
2.4 Cost related to Training/ Briefing, Interviews in other Cities etc will
be invoiced once approved on actual basis.
2.5 A Fix fees of US S 1250.00 per month will be charged as service charges
towards disbursement of salaries.
2.6 GST as applicable.
3. Salary Reimbursement of Crew members.
RMS will transfer Salary of Crews to DRS SFC A/C¯ as a single remittance,
and DRS will instruct the bank to disburse the Crew Salary as per list
provided by RMS to respective bank Accounts of Crew members.
4. Reimbursement of Travel Cost
4.1 DRS will arrange travel for Officers/Crew for RMS subject to fare
approval.
4.2 Travel Agency will raise invoice to RMS C/O DRS.
4.3 DRS will pay to travel agencies for and on behalf of RMS.
4.4 Monthly Reimbursement bill towards travel cost will be raised by DRS to
RMS.
The applicant has raised following query:-
Qs. No. |
Questions raised by the applicant |
Submission as per ACT & RULE |
B |
Whether GST liability is applicable only/ purely on DRS Marine Commission and not on Salary amount which we are supposed to receive in DRS-SFC A/C for disbursal? |
Rule 33. Value of supply
of services in case of pure agent.- Notwithstanding anything contained
in the provisions of this Chapter, the expenditure or costs incurred by
a supplier as a pure agent of the recipient of supply shall be excluded
from the value of supply, if all the following conditions are satisfied,
namely,- |
04. HEARING
The case was taken up for Preliminary hearing on dt. 04.07.2018 when Sh. Mukund
Pol, C.A. along with Sh. R. S. Bajwa, Director appeared & requested for
admission of application as per contentions in their ARA. They were requested to
provide copies of contracts that they were having with RMS in respect of
recruitment services and salary transfer services or contract of any other
nature as applicable. Jurisdictional Officer, Ms. R. S. lyer, State Tax Officer
appeared and stated they have made written submissions.
The application was admitted and called for final hearing on 01.08.2018. Sh.
Mukund Pol, C.A. along with Sh. R. S. Bajwa, Director appeared and made oral and
written submissions. Jurisdictional Officer, Sh. Avinash Shinde, Dy. Commr of
SGST appeared and made written submissions.
05. OBSERVATIONS
We have gone through the facts of the case, documents on record and submissions
made by both, the applicant and the department.
The applicant is a Crew Recruitment and Placement Agency, and are involved in
selecting and recruiting shipping personnel on behalf of their principal/ client
who is a Foreign Ship Owner and for which they are charging Administration fees
and paying GST on such Administration charges so received. The applicant has
submitted that their principal has requested them for disbursal Of salary to the
crew members from the applicants side, for which the principal would be
transferring the sum of total salary to the applicant who in turn will be
disbursing the salary to the crew member through banking channels into their
respective accounts. For this activity, the applicant would be charging/
invoicing service charges to the principal and on the said charges they would be
discharging their GST liability.
Applicant has further submitted that the above said activity of distributing
salaries would on behalf of their Foreign Principal & they would not be
deducting any charges from the amount of salary received for disbursement.
Hence, they have contended that, the amount so remitted towards disbursal of
salary would not be taxable under GST in view of provisions of Rule 33 of the
CGST Rules, 2017.
The applicant has submitted that as per Regulation 6 of Foreign Exchange
Management (Foreign Currency Accounts by a person resident in India)
Regulations, 2000 notified vide Notification No. FEMA 10/2000-RB dated May 3,
2000, as amended from time to time, and A.P. (DIR Series) Circular No. 48 dated
April 30, 2007, general permission is available to ship- manning/crew managing
agencies that are rendering services to shipping/ airline companies incorporated
outside India, to open, hold and maintain non-interest bearing foreign currency
account with an AD Category - I bank in India for meeting the local expenses in
India of such shipping or airline company.
The question raised by the applicant is connected with their agreement that they
have entered into with M/s. Reefership Marine Services Limited (RMS), situated
in Bermuda, i.e. outside India. The agreement made on the 01.11.2003 between the
applicant and RMS, has been submitted by the applicant and by way of which the
applicant would assist RMS to hire officers of Indian Nationality for their
vessels. As per the agreement the applicant would assist RMS in the selection of
qualified Senior/ Junior officers for employment on board vessels as when
required by RMS, for which they would be paid a certain fee to cover the
administrative costs and mobilization expenses and they would also be paid communication costs. Vide the proposed Addendum #5 an amendment has been
proposed and one of the amendments, under point no. 3 of the Addendum#5
submitted by the applicant at page 11 of their submissions dated 13.07.2018 is
as under:-
3. Salary Reimbursement of Crew Members
RMS will transfer Salary of Crews to DRS SFC A/C¯ as a single remittance,
and DRS will instruct the bank to disburse the Crew Salary as per list provided
by RMS to respective Bank Accounts of Crew Members.
At point 2.5 of the said addendum it is mentioned that a fix fees of LIS$
1250.00 per month will be charged as service charges towards disbursement of
salaries inclusive of GST applicable¯
From a reading of points 2.5 and 3 of the Addendum #5 submitted by the applicant
it is clear that the Salary of Crews of RMS will be deposited in the account of
the applicant in one go and the same will be transferred from the applicants
account directly to the bank accounts of the Crews, by the bank, on the
directions of the applicant. Here we find that the entire amount received by the
applicant from RMS towards salary of crews is disbursed as such. Hence with
respect to this transaction it is crystal clear that the applicant is acting as
a pure agent of RMS.
Here is to reiterate that the amounts that are to be transferred to this account
have to be genuinely in respect of salary of crew as discussed and no other
amounts which are not authorized and due as salary can be handled through this
account by the applicant.
We find that Rule 33 of the GST Rules would cover these types of transactions
and is reproduced as under:-
Rule 33. - Value of supply of services in case of pure agent.-
Notwithstanding anything contained in the provisions of this Chapter, the
expenditure or costs incurred by a supplier as a pure agent of the recipient of
supply shall be excluded from the value of supply, if all the following
conditions are satisfied, namely,-
(i) the supplier acts as a pure agent of the recipient of the supply, when he
makes the payment to the third party on authorisation by such recipient;
(ii) the payment made by the pure agent on behalf of the recipient of supply has
been separately indicated in the invoice issued by the pure agent to the
recipient of service; and
(iii) the supplies procured by the pure agent from the third party as a pure
agent of the recipient of supply are in addition to the services he supplies on
his own account.
Explanation.- For the purposes of this rule, the expression pure agent¯ means a
person who-
(a) enters into a contractual agreement with the recipient of supply to act as
his pure agent to incur expenditure or costs in the course of supply of goods or
services or both;
(b) neither intends to hold nor holds any title to the goods or services or both
so procured or supplied as pure agent of the recipient of supply;
(c) does not use for his own interest such goods or services so procured; and
(d) receives only the actual amount incurred to procure such goods or services
in addition to the amount received for supply he provides on his own account.
From the above provisions of Rule 33 and the facts of the proposed transaction
explained by the applicant, we find that the applicant will be acting as a pure
agent of RMS in as much as the entire amount received by them as Crews Salary
will be disbursed to the Crew and no amounts from the said receipt will be used
by the applicant for his own interest. In fact, for performing as a pure agent
they will also be receiving compensation separately in the form of fixed fees to
be charged as service charges.
In view of the above we are of the opinion that the applicant will not be liable
to pay GST on Salary amount received from RMS and disbursed to the Crew.
05. In view of the extensive deliberations as held hereinabove, we pass an order
as follows:
ORDER
(Under section 98 Of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the
Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
NO.GST-ARA-34/2018-19/B-99
Mumbai, dt. 24/08/2018
For reasons as discussed in
the body of the order, the questions are answered thus -
Question:- Whether GST is applicable on Reimbursement of salary on behalf of
foreign entity.
Place:- Mumbai
Date: 24/08/2018
-sd-
B.V. Borhade
(MEMBER)
-sd-
PANKAJ KUMAR
(MEMBER)
Copy to:
1. The applicant
2. The concerned Central / State officer
3. The Commissioner of State Tax, Maharashtra State, Mumbai
4. The Commissioner of Central Tax, Churchgate Mumbai
5. Joint commissioner of State Tax , Mahavikas for Website.
Note :- An Appeal against this advance ruling order shall be made before The Maharashtra Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling for Goods and Services Tax, 15th floor, Air India building, Nariman Point, Mumbai - 400021.
Equivalent .