2021(03)LCX0234(AAAR)
AAAR-TAMIL NADU
M/s Kalyan Jewellers India Limited
decided on 30/03/2021
TAMILNADU STATE APPELLATE
AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING
Constituted under Section 99 of the Tamilnadu Goods and
Services Tax Act 2017
A.R. Appeal No. 01/2020/AAAR
Dated: 30.03.2021
BEFORE THE BENCH OF
1. Thiru G.V. KRISHNA RAO, MEMBER
2. Thiru M. A. SIDDIQUE, MEMBER
Order-in-Appeal No. AAAR/11/2021 (AR)
(Passed by Tamilnadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling under Section 101(1) of the Tamilnadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
Preamble
1. In terms of Section
102 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act 2017/Tamilnadu Goods &
Services Tax Act 2017(“the Act”, in Short), this Order may be amended by
the Appellate authority so as to rectify any error apparent on the face
of the record, if such error is noticed by the Appellate authority on
its own accord, or is brought to its notice by the concerned officer,
the jurisdictional officer or the applicant within a period of six
months from the date of the Order. Provided that no rectification which
has the effect of enhancing the tax liability or reducing the amount of
admissible input tax credit shall be made, unless the appellant has been
given an opportunity of being heard. |
Name and address of the appellant | M/s. Kalyan Jewellers India Limited 5th Cross, 100 Feet Road, Gandhipuram, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu. |
GSTIN or User ID | 33AADCK6079K1Z8 |
Advance Ruling Order against which appeal is filed | Order No. 52/ARA/2019 dated 25.11.2019 |
Date of filing appeal | 28.01.2020 |
Represented by | Tvl. J. Nandakumar, Advocate, Tvl. J. Poojesh, Advocate, and Tvl. Ms. Harini S.P., Advocate |
Jurisdictional Authority- Centre | Coimbatore Comissionerate |
Jurisdictional Authority- State | The Deputy Commissioner (ST) Divisional Large Tax Payers Unit, C.T. Building, Dr. Balasundaram Road, Coimbatore |
Whether payment of fees for filing appeal is discharged, If yes, the amount and challan details | Yes, Payment of Rs. 20000/- made vide 1. challan No. UTIB 20013300464507 dated 24.01.2020. 2. challan No. UTIB 20013300508078 dated 29.01.2020. |
At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the Central Goods and Service Tax Act would also mean a reference to the same provisions under the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act.
The subject appeal has been filed
under Section 100(1) of the Tamilnadu Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017/Central
Goods & Services Tax Act 2017 by Tvl. Kalyan Jewellers India Limited
(hereinafter referred to as ‘Appellant). The appellant is registered under GST
vide GSTIN 33AADCK6079K1Z8. The appeal is filed against the Order No. 52 /ARA
/2019 dated 25.11.2019 passed by the Tamilnadu State Authority for Advance
ruling on the application for advance ruling filed by the appellant.
2.1 The Appellant is in the business of manufacturing and trading of Jewellery
Products. As a part of sales promotion the Appellant introduced the facility of
different types of Pre-Paid Instruments (PPI’s) viz., Closed System PPIs,
Semi-closed System PPIs, Open System PPIs through its retail outlets , third
party PPI issuers and online portals to their Customers and these are generally
called “Gift Vouchers/Gift Cards” in trade practice. The Appellant has sought
Advance Ruling on the following questions:
(i) Whether the issue of own closed PPIs by the ‘Applicant’ to their customers
be treated as supply of goods or supply of service
(ii) If yes, is the time of issue of PPI’s by the Applicant to their Customers
is the time of supply of goods or services warranting tax liability
(iii),If yes, what is the applicable rate of tax for such supply of goods or
services?”
(iii),If yes, whether the issue of PPIs by the Third party PPI ssuers subject to
GST at the time of issue in their hands?
(iv). Whether the amount received by the Applicant from Third Party PPI issuers
subject to GST?
(v) If No, GST collection at the time of sale of goods or services on redemption
of PPIs i.e., own and from Third Party will be a sufficient compliance of the
provisions of the Act?
(vi) The treatment of discount (the difference between Face value and Discounted
Value) in the hands of issuer of PPI in case of third party PPIs? Whether the
applicant will be liable to pay GST on this difference Value?
3. The AAR pronounced the following rulings:
i) The Own closed PPIs issued by the Applicant are ‘vouchers’ as defined under
CGST/TNGST Act 2017 and are a supply of goods under CGST/TNGST Act 2017
ii) The time of supply of such gift vouchers / gift cards by the applicant to
the customers shall be the date of issue of vouchers if the vouchers are
specific to any particular goods specified against the voucher. If the gift
vouchers/gift cards are redeemable against any goods bought, the time of supply
is the date of redemption of voucher.
iii) In the case of paper based gift vouchers classifiable under CTH 4911 the
applicable rate is 6% CGST as per Sl.No. 132 of Schedule II of the Notification
No. 1/2017-C.T.(Rate) dated 28.06.2017and 6% SGST as per Sl.No. 132 of Schedule
II of Notification Ms. No. II(2)/CTR/532(d-4)/2017 vide G.O. (Ms) No. 62 dated
29.06.2017 as amended. In the case of gift cards classifiable under CTH 8523 the
applicable rate is is 9% CGST as per Sl.No. 382 of Schedule III of the
Notification No. 1/2017-C.T.(Rate) dated 28.06.2017 and 9% SGST as per SI.No.
382 of Schedule III of Notification Ms. No. II(2)/CTR/532(d-4)/2017 vide G.O.
(Ms) No. 62 dated 29.06.2017.
iv) The questions raised at Sl.No. 4,5,6 and 7 are not answered for the reason
that the said questions are not admitted as this authority does not have
jurisdiction.
4. Aggrieved by the above decision, the Appellant has filed the present appeal.
The grounds of appeal are as follows:
The voucher or PPI only have a redeemable face value and no intrinsic value
capable of it being considered as marketable for the purpose of levy of GST. It
is submitted that the amounts received upon such issuance of PPI’s are treated
and entered as ‘Other Current Liabilities’ in the statement of accounts, and
only when the instruments are redeemed the amounts received are credited to the
sales/revenue account of the Appellant. It is submitted that the PPI’s are
issued to the customers in card as well as digital formats and it is not sold to
the customers. The PPI’s are in the nature of actionable claims and not goods.
It is submitted that if the PPI’s are made liable to tax, it would amount to
double taxation as GST is levied on the supply of jewellery made by the
appellant also at the time of redemption of a voucher is against the provisions
of Law as well as the EU Council Directives.
PERSONAL HEARING:
5. The Appellant was granted personal hearing as required under law before this
Appellate Authority on 3rd February 2021. The Authorized representatives of the
Appellant Tvl.J.Nandakumar, Advocate, Tvl.J.Poojesh, Advocate and Ms. Sri Harini
S.P, Advocate of the appellant company appeared for hearing. They reiterated the
written submissions and claimed that PPI are actionable claims and not taxable
to GST. Further they were asked to furnish any decision on ‘Vouchers are
actionable claim’ and were allowed to have another hearing in Digital mode.
6. A virtual hearing was granted on 22nd February 2021 during which time they
furnished additional written submissions and copies of judgements / decisions
cited by them. Further to a specific query whether there is a provision for
giving back cash in case the customer does not want to exchange the voucher for
goods, they promised to come back with proof of the same. On 24th February 2021,
they attached true copies of gift vouchers along with terms and conditions
appended therein.
DISCUSSION & FINDINGS:
7.1 We have carefully considered the various submissions made by the Appellant
and the applicable statutory provisions. The arguments of the appellant may be
summarised as follows:
7.2 Vouchers issued by the appellant are of the nature of actionable claims.
Actionable claims, though included within the definition of goods under section
2(52), have been included in schedule III as entry 6 and therefore cannot be
treated either as supply of goods or supply of services. It follows that
vouchers are not subject to levy of tax under the GST act.
7.3 Our view is that there is an inherent contradiction in this argument, with
the provision in sub sections (4) of section 12 and 13, that deal with
determining the time of supply for goods and services respectively, both use the
term ‘voucher’, and therefore indicate that voucher relate to both goods and
services. If vouchers are to be treated as actionable claims, they are only
goods and not services.
7.4 Notwithstanding the above, we are also of the view that vouchers are neither
goods nor services, and to that extent, without the need to examine whether
voucher is an actionable claim, agree with the appellant, but for different
reasons. Our reasoning is as follows:
7.5 A voucher is a means for advance payment of consideration for future supply
of goods or services:
(75) — ‘money’ means the Indian legal tender or any foreign currency, cheque,
promissory note, bill of exchange, letter of credit, draft, pay order, traveller
cheque, money order, postal or electronic remittance or any other instrument
recognized by the Reserve Bank of India when used as a consideration
to settle an obligation or exchange with Indian legal tender of another
denomination but shall not include any currency that is held for its numismatic
value;
(118) — ‘voucher’ means an instrument where there is an obligation to
accept it as consideration or part consideration for a supply of goods or
services or both and where the goods or services or both to be supplied or the
identities of their potential suppliers are either indicated on the instrument
itself or in related documentation, including the terms and conditions of use of
such instrument;
7.6 Voucher, being an instrument used as consideration to settle an application,
is a type of money, and as long as such instrument is recognised by the Reserve
Bank of India. Even if such voucher is not recognised by Reserve Bank of India,
it would still form a means of payment of consideration, though it does not
constitute money under the above definition.
7.7 Subsections (4) of sections 12 and 13 read as follows:
In case of supply of vouchers by a supplier, the time of supply shall be—
(a) The date of issue of voucher, if the supply is identifiable at that point;
or
(b) the date of redemption of voucher, in all other cases.
7.8 These sub-sections must be read and interpreted in the context of section 12
and section 13. These two sections specify the time of supply for goods and
services respectively. For instance, section 12 (2) deems the supply of goods to
have taken place on the date of issue of invoice or date of receipt of payment,
whichever is earlier, even if the goods are actually delivered to the recipient
later. Likewise, subsection (4) of section 12 and 13 deem the supply of the
underlying good(s) or service(s) for which the voucher has been issued, to have
taken place on the date of issue of voucher, if the supply is identifiable at
that point, or the date of redemption of voucher in all other cases.
7.9 To conclude, when a voucher is issued, though it is just a means of advance
payment of consideration for a future supply, subsection (4) of section 12 and
13 determine the time of supply of the of the underlying good(s) or service(s).
Voucher per se is neither a goods not a service. It is a means for payment of
consideration.
7.10 Therefore, there is no need to determine whether voucher is an actionable
claim to arrive at a conclusion that it is neither a goods nor a service.
7.11 It therefore follows that where a voucher identifies the goods or service
that can be received on redeeming, the supply of the underlying goods or service
takes place at the time of issue of the voucher. This is the case with vouchers
issued by a metro rail company for monthly trip tickets. In such cases, it may
not even be possible to know when vouchers would be redeemed for availing of
train service„ and therefore, the law provides for taxing of the service at the
point of time of issue of voucher itself when the supply is clearly known at the
time of issue. The supply of underlying goods or service therefore gets taxed
only at the time of issue of voucher and not at the time of actual availing of
service or time of redeeming the voucher. The same is true in the case of the
gold voucher presently under our consideration. Since the gold voucher clearly
indicates that the voucher can be redeemed for gold jewellery at a known rate of
tax, gold voucher also falls under this category. Therefore, it is our view that
the gold voucher (representing the underlying future supply of gold jewellery)
would be taxable at the time of issue of the voucher. It must be emphasised that
this interpretation does not result in double taxation as transfer of gold
subsequently will not be subject to tax at the time of redeeming the voucher for
gold, as the supply is deemed to have been done at the time of issue of voucher
itself (section 12(4)).
7.12 Basing that taxing vouchers cannot be understood solely from the provisions
contained in GST law, the appellants have urged us and brought in European
Council directives, etc., that is to look into foreign legislation and
jurisprudence. However, in Indian context, vouchers has cross-linkage to RBI
master directions pertaining to Pre-Paid Instruments apart from the relevant
contractual terms and conditions. Therefore, each and every case is to be
examined critically based on the facts and circumstances and context of that
case and a generic proposition or a ratio decidendi cannot be adopted.
7.13. Voucher by GST law is recognized as an instrument of consideration
(non-monetary form) for future supply. Regarding classification of voucher,
since voucher is only an instrument of consideration and not goods or services,
the same is not classifiable separately but only the supply associated with the
voucher is classifiable according to the nature of the goods or services
supplied in exchange of the voucher earlier issued to the customer.
8. In the light of the above, we rule as under:
RULING
The Order of the Advance Ruling
Authority is modified to the extent as discussed in para 7.11 and 7.13 above as
follows:
The time of supply of the gift vouchers / gift cards by the applicant to the
customers shall be the date of issue of such vouchers and the applicable rate of
tax is that applicable to that of the goods.
The subject appeal is disposed of accordingly.
(M. A. SIDDIQUE)
Principal Secretary/
Commissioner of Commercial Tax
Tamil Nadu/ Member, AAAR.
(G. V. KRISHNA RAO)
Principal Chief Commissioner of
GST & Central Excise,
Chennai Zone/Member, AAAR.
To
Tvl. Kalyan Jewellers India Limited
5th Cross, 100 Feet Road,
Gandhipuram, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu.
// By RPAD/ officeparna6@gmail.com//
Copy to:
1. The Principal Chief
Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, 26/1, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam,
Chennai-600034.
2. The Principal Secretary/ Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, II Floor,
Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.
3. Joint Commissioner(ST)/Member, Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamil Nadu, Room
No.503B, 5th Floor, Integrated commercial taxes Office complex, No.
32, Elephant Gate Bridge Road, Chennai-600 003.
4. The Commissioner of GST & Central Excise, Coimbatore Commissionerate 6/7,
ATD Street, Race Course Road, Coimbatore-641018.
5. The Deputy Commissioner(ST) Divisional Large Tax Payers Unit C.T. Building.
Dr. Balasundaram Road, Coimbatore
6. Master File/ Spare.
Equivalent .